Kathryn Schulz’s ‘Lost & Found’

Have read, then partially listened to, an interview (dated 30th may 2025) in the New York Times recently with Kathryn Schulz, a staff writer with The New Yorker and a winner of the Pulitzer Prize . She’s interviewed by Ezra Klein about her 2022 book, ‘Lost & Found’.

Eighteen months before Kathryn Schulz’s beloved father died, she met the woman she would marry. In Lost & Found, she weaves the stories of those relationships into a brilliant exploration of how all our lives are shaped by loss and discovery-from the maddening disappearance of everyday objects to the sweeping devastations of war, pandemic, and natural disaster; from finding new planets to falling in love.

There are many memorable moments within this interview. Kathryn Schulz is a gifted conversationalist (though not to the same degree as her father, apparently, who ‘could talk me under the table’), and Klein has prepared his questions well. The interview’s behind a paywall I assume, but let me quote just one question and response (and recommend you seek out Kathryn’s work online):

Is there an experience that comes to mind for you recently, where you were looking at something small and you saw something big in it — or big and you saw something small in it?

Sure. I’m going to tell a story that sounds like it can’t possibly be true, and I swear it is.

What you need to know by way of context for this story is that a year or so ago, my partner and I bought the house across the street from the farm where she was born and raised, and where her parents still live. We’ve been gradually renovating it ever since then and were incredibly excited to move in and to be near family and, frankly, near more child care.

We finally move in, and I’m reveling in this beautiful new home as we settle in. Then — this is only a week ago — my daughter, who’s now 3½ — we have these beautiful fields outside of our house, and she wanders off into the field and returns with a stalk of wheat and says: Look, Mama. So I’m thinking: Oh, she found a stalk of wheat — fun! Children pick up everything, right? Clovers, coins, anything muddy, tarantulas — whatever they can find.

So she hands me this stalk of wheat, and I’m thinking: Oh, how sweet, she gets to live in this beautiful setting where the outdoors is full of so many wonderful little things for her to study. Then she looks at me very seriously and says: Mama, we should use this wheat to make bread for people who don’t have any.

It’s just one of those moments as a parent, where, on the one hand, you’re just so in love with your child. You think: Who made this remarkable mind?

I’m sitting there thinking she found a pretty flower or something, and there she is apparently thinking about the poor and privation and need. So right away my sense of the scale of what we were talking about just wildly shifted.

But also, to be honest, right alongside feeling overwhelming awe for her, I felt so morally indicted. I am literally in the middle of reveling in my pretty new kitchen, and then suddenly, I’m confronted with real hunger in the world, and I’m thinking: Why do I have this beautiful backsplash? What have I done here? My 3-year-old has more moral clarity than I do about how we should spend our money and our time and what actually matters in life.

So, yes, in a wonderful way, I feel like my world is full of discoveries that seem small and blossom out into the enormous. Or seem enormous and then have some kind of bearing on small, practical things, like how to be a family and how to raise children. It’s often incredibly humbling. And sometimes it’s very funny, and sometimes it’s very moving. In that case, it was all the above.

The book’s available at Readings Bookshop in Melbourne, costs $34.99.

US politics — The client’s the voter…

There’s a thoughtful interview on the New York Times web site … ‘The Interview’ Feb 15, 2025, Lulu Garcia-Navarro in conversation with Senator Ruben Gallego of Arizona …

Senator Gallego:

“The base Democratic voter wants to be rich. And there’s nothing wrong with that. And so our job is to expose when there are abuses by, quote-unquote, the rich, the wealthy, the powerful. Then that’s how we get those people that want to aspire to that to vote for Democrats.”

Lulu Garcia-Navarro:

“So Elon Musk, Donald Trump, are these the people who have actually figured out how to connect with the working class?”

Senator Gallego:

“Yes. Yeah. We just had an election that proved that. I mean — ”

Lulu Garcia-Navarro:

“Why?”

Senator Gallego:

“Well, I think because they both are two things that I think a lot of Democratic politicians are. No. 1, they actually understand, quote-unquote, the consumer. Right? And because they are engaged in, every day, one way or the other, trying to talk to the consumer. And in this case, it’s the voter, right?”

Lulu Garcia-Navarro:

“That’s so interesting. They’re salesmen, essentially.”

Senator Gallego:

“Yeah, exactly.”

Lulu Garcia-Navarro

“And they understand who the client is.”

Senator Gallego:

“Mm-hmm. The client’s the voter. And they don’t care. By the way, that’s the other thing that’s — they don’t care how they get the sale done. Right? This is why you saw during the campaign, Trump said, You know what? No tax on tips. We’re not going to tax your security, all this kind of stuff. And on the other side, people were like, Well, that’s really going to do something and do an imbalance to the budget deficit. What did Donald Trump care? He just wanted to win, right? What does Elon Musk want to do? He just wants to win, right? He knows where the voter is, and he’ll get there however he can get there. But they’re closer to the ground, to where the base voter is, than to some of us Democrats.”