I was talking to Richard Wastell the other day – Richard is
one of the most creatively and intellectually interesting of the island’s
visual art talents, in my view – and I was extolling the generosity and
large-heartedness that characterises Tasmania’s writing community.
And I contrasted this with the situation in the visual arts, wherein
I discerned a dismayingly entrenched tendency to petty envy and
mean-spiritedness. Richard fired back. The situation in the visual
arts, he said, is actually much the healthier. What I was labelling
a lack of generosity and fellow-feeling was actually a critical
culture that spurs the artistic restlessness essential to ever greater
achievement, whereas what I was describing as a supportive and
large-hearted culture within literature was actually a self-serving
mutual boosterism – saccharine, mindlessly congratulatory, smug,
and complacent.
Now, counting today, this will be the fifth book I’ve launched
in this calendar year, and three of these have been books of poetry.
So, in the wash-up of this robust interchange with my good friend
Richie, I was moved to review
my position, and in particular,
the fulsome praise I had earlier
accorded Henry Sheerwater and
the four authors of Seasoned with
Honey. And it’s true that when
you agree to launch a book you
do so sight unseen, and you are
taking a punt on the basis of what
you already know of the author as
both a person and a writer. And if
you get it wrong – too bad: you’re
stuck.
My re-valuation of recent
Tasmanian poetry was forced
and urgent, and I have been appropriately tough minded, let me assure you. But it has confirmed in me the essential validity of my
broken-record laudation of recent Tasmanian poetry, a theme most of
you will have heard me bang on about before today, sometimes more
than once. A dog with a bone I might well be on this subject, but I am
just telling it as it is – there really is an extraordinary poetic corpus
emerging from this island. I’m prepared to concede that Richie’s right
and I’m wrong about the visual arts. But he’s wrong and I’m right on
the matter of the island’s poets. So I would not want to revise anything
that I’ve had to say about Tasmanian poetry generally, or about those
marvellous individual volumes that I was privileged to launch earlier
in the year. And I am going to strike a very similar chord today, for my
assessment of Karen’s book is that here is literary achievement of the
very highest. I’m going to tell you why you should – indeed, need – to
read this book.
It is a privilege to celebrate the birth of Karen Knight’s Postcards
from the Asylum. This is a book with its street cred firmly established.
It has been many years in the making, and individual poems have
found a wide variety of placements, some of them overseas. Some
have won prizes. The collection itself won the 2007 ACT Poetry Prize
for an unpublished manuscript. A couple of poems have been set
to music by a New York-based Korean composer. Some poems are
already in process of translation.
Now. You’d have thought the incarceration of political
troublemakers to be a hallmark of brutal totalitarian repression,
wouldn’t you. That such a thing could never happen in an enlightened
democratic state founded on the liberal virtues. You’d be wrong.
These poems are based on a period spent by Karen in what, way
back when, we called the Looney Bin – for the simple ‘pathology’
of youthful rebelliousness that she shared with an entire generation.
And there, in the Looney Bin, she copped the full treatment. It must
have needed quite some reservoir of courage to write about it.
In these pages we meet an array of characters. The omnipresent,
faceless, remote and vaguely threatening ‘Nightingales’. David, the
catatonic doctor’s son. The SAD one (‘SAD’ standing for ‘Seasonal
Affective Disorder’). Helen and Emily. Valium Val. Psycho-Paul.
But most of all we meet a young woman at once vulnerable
and resilient; and we meet an institution, and a ‘system’. We meet
madness. We meet madness, but where do we locate madness? What
is the institutional contribution to the mad world of these poems?
Who, or what, is really mad? For starters, the very ambience is mad.
Karen brings this mad life of pathos and casual brutality
vividly to life. Menace lurks constantly and everywhere. There’s
an extraordinary poem called ‘Doing the Rounds’ – it’s on page
50 – where the medication trolley becomes the embodiment of the
menace that lodges in the very fabric of the ‘facility’. ‘It shadows the
walls’, Karen tells us, ‘a balding stalker pedalling the ward’. It will not
surprise you to learn, then, that some poems are utterly harrowing.
‘The Deep Maternal’ on page 18. ‘Insanity’ on page 24. ‘My First
ECG’ on page 27. ‘I Have Seen’ on page 88. These poems provide the
collection with its power; with the emotional challenge with which
the reader is presented.
We are also given insights into the social construction of
madness, and the consequences of this for the individual. ‘Insanity’
again and, on page 22, ‘Yellow Pages’. And the come-hither pull of selfobliteration
– often by ‘jumping’ – is ever-present, and sometimes, as
we read in ‘Paul Hanged Himself Today’ on page 75, it is a promise
consummated.
I think, though, that the most breathtaking thing about this
collection is the complexity of tone that it achieves. Beauty is never
extinguished. A beauty of colour – a horrifying beauty – is present in
a virtuoso deployment of ECT imagery in the brilliant poem, ‘Shock’,
on page 42. Sound also makes a telling contribution to the complex
and ambivalent overarching effect. Much of the beauty is of an utmost
delicacy, all the more exquisite for the context in which it appears.
Look at the beautiful little poem, ‘Willow Tree’, on page 90. Birds are
a recurring motif. And there is humour. Sometimes grim, savage, as
in ‘Postcard Therapy’ on page 15 and ‘Pharmacopieia’ on page 84, and
sometimes wry and whimsical, as in ‘Sense and Sensibility’ on page
48, ‘Beyond the Pale Clichės’ on page 58, and ‘Finding Utopia in the
New Recreation Complex’ on p. 91.
That’s the poetry. I should also talk about the poet.
For me, the signature quality of Karen’s verse is its power. It
is – I hope Karen won’t find this offensive – it is muscular. She is not
writing to titillate, nor to prettily entertain, still less to amuse. She is
an ambitious poet – she would change us – change how we see the
world. She demands of us a courage to match her own, both as a person
who could endure these harrowing experiences and as a poet with the
emotional strength to put them to artistic account. She has seen such
things – and from the most grimly prosaic of experiences she extracts
poetry, with a hint of the surreal that effectively counterpoints this
most anti-poetic of experiences.
Much of the power in Karen’s poetry comes from the attention
she gives to ensuring each poem’s closure is thoroughly memorable.
I’ve always thought of Dylan Thomas as the master of the opening
line, and Mary Oliver as the dabbest hand at the ending. Which is
more important? It is the ending, I think – for that is what stays with
you; what sums the mood and feel and impact of the poem. So it is
that many of the individual poems from Postcards from the Asylum
haunt your sensibilities long after the reading of them.
And she is just so deft, so commanding, in her assured
deployment of language. Most poems are linguistic and emotional
distillations, and all the more powerful on that account. I am myself
a poet given to rambling, needlessly discursive verbal shapelessness
– and I envy Karen’s capacity for poetry that is stiletto-sharp. May it
continue to flow.
Here, then, is a poet at the height of her powers – and the poetry
featured in this volume deserves to be widely read, and to endure
through the estimations of time.
And just finally, I’d like to talk about this book as a production. A
month or so ago, in the Mercury, Chris Bantick was extremely critical
of much Tasmanian literature, arguing in essence that Tasmanian
production is too democratic; too deficient in quality control. I think
Chris missed the mark in some important respects, but one of his
criticisms with which I do agree is that much Tasmanian publishing
is too careless with – or, at least, insufficiently valuing of – the
importance of design. Such a criticism could never be levelled at
Pardalote Press. This book is beautifully made, right down to the
hand-made poem titles, and the slightly unsettling off-true title page,
a rendering that subtly underscores the theme of the collection.
So. Postcards from the Asylum is a triumph. Important,
wonderfully wrought poems in which the parts coalesce within a
gestalt that is a single extraordinary achievement. I congratulate
Pardalote Press, and I pay homage to a brilliant Tasmanian poet.